Ad rates on digital are significantly lower than on print and TV. - Ritvvij Parrikh Ad rates on digital are significantly lower than on print and TV. | Ritvvij Parrikh Humane ClubMade with Humane Club

Ad rates on digital are significantly lower than on print and TV.


Businesses pay top dollar for advertising on Print and TV. However, the same isn’t the case for digital.

  • Reach: In TV and Print, the DAU/MAU is assumed 100%. The same isn’t true for digital.
  • Targeting: Targeting is assumed in newspaper and TV. Most digital publishers have not enforced login struggle to build First Party Data. This makes it impossible to know socio-economic and demographic information about these Anonymous Audience. Hence, businesses pay lesser ad rates if one cannot Target advertisements.
  • In TV and Print, all sales is Direct-sold. However, in digital a substantial portion is Indirect-sold.
    • Bid down: In Digital, ad networks operate as bidding engines, i.e., the publisher that bids the lowest gets the Digital Advertisements. In contrast, in TV and Print, the businesses bid (up) to get space in a relatively scarce property.
    • Cut: These ad networks can take up to ~45% of the revenue.
    • Can’t monetize premiumness of platform: All businesses want to advertise on a premium Owned Identity, for example, a premium platform like The Times of India newspaper instead of an ad hoc billboard. Hence, Print and TV command premium rate. However, when advertising via ad networks, a business cannot say that it wants its advertisement to appear on a specific website. It could go to anyone who bids the lowest.
Copied

Links to this Evergreen Note

None yet